The built-in compile() expects source is encoded in utf-8.
This behavior make it harder to implement alternative shell
like IDLE and IPython. (http://bugs.python.org/issue1542677 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ipython/+bug/339642 are related bugs.)

Below is current compile() behavior.

# Python's interactive shell in Windows cp932 console.
>>> "あ"
'\x82\xa0'
>>> u"あ"
u'\u3042'

# compile() fails to decode str.
>>> code = compile('u"あ"', '__interactive__', 'single')
>>> exec code
u'\x82\xa0'  # u'\u3042' expected.

# compile() encodes unicode to utf-8.
>>> code = compile(u'"あ"', '__interactive__', 'single')
>>> exec code
'\xe3\x81\x82' # '\x82\xa0' (cp932) wanted, but I get utf-8.

Currentry, using PEP0263 like below is needed to get compile
code in expected encoding.

>>> code = compile('# coding: cp932\n%s' % ('"あ"',), '__interactive__', 
'single')
>>> exec code
'\x82\xa0'
>>> code = compile('# coding: cp932\n%s' % ('u"あ"',), '__interactive__', 
'single')
>>> exec code
u'\u3042'

But I feel compile() with PEP0263 is bit dirty hack.
I think adding a 'encoding' argument that have a 'utf-8' as default value to
compile() is cleaner way and it doesn't break backward compatibility.

Following example is describe behavior of compile() with encoding option.

# coding: utf-8 (in utf-8 context)
code = compile('"あ"', '__foo.py', 'single')
exec code #=> '\xe3\x81\x82'

code = compile('"あ"', '__foo.py', 'single', encoding='cp932') => 
UnicodeDecodeError

code = compile(u'"あ"', '__foo.py', 'single')
exec code #=> '\xe3\x81\x82'

code = compile(u'"あ"', '__foo.py', 'single', encoding='cp932')
exec code #=> '\x82\xa0'

add sample implementation.

The patch as it currently stands is unacceptable because it changes
public APIs.

Anyone interested in producing an updated patch?

This problem is not heavy on Python 3.
Because Python 3's byte string can't contain non-ASCII string directory.
So passing unicode string to the compile() is good enough for all cases I can imagine.

I'll close this then.