Message 103276 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	spiv
Recipients	exarkun, neologix, r.david.murray, spiv
Date	2010-04-15.23:29:13
SpamBayes Score	5.7069184e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> I'm not exactly sure how we will know if it is expected to fail, > though. I don't think `HAVE_SIGACTION` is exposed nicely to Python > right now. It might be useful to have the contents of pyconfig.h exposed as a dict somehow. Maybe call it sys._pyconfig_h? A less ambitious change would be to expose just HAVE_SIGACTION as e.g. signal._have_sigaction. I agree with r.david.murray that we probably don't need to bother unless a buildbot or someone reports that this test fails.

> I'm not exactly sure how we will know if it is expected to fail,
> though.  I don't think `HAVE_SIGACTION` is exposed nicely to Python
> right now.

It might be useful to have the contents of pyconfig.h exposed as a dict somehow.  Maybe call it sys._pyconfig_h?

A less ambitious change would be to expose just HAVE_SIGACTION as e.g. signal._have_sigaction.

I agree with r.david.murray that we probably don't need to bother unless a buildbot or someone reports that this test fails.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-04-15 23:29:15	spiv	set	recipients: + spiv, exarkun, r.david.murray, neologix
2010-04-15 23:29:14	spiv	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-04-15 23:29:13	spiv	link	issue8354 messages
2010-04-15 23:29:13	spiv	create