Message 105497 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, pitrou
Date	2010-05-11.11:12:00
SpamBayes Score	0.00031324226
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
This must be retargeted to 3.2. Also, the patch lacks some tests. It seems PEP 8 compliance could be better: function names shouldn't be CamelCased. Is LocalSynchronize() an implementation detail rather than a public API? If so, I think it would be better if it started with an underscore.

This must be retargeted to 3.2. Also, the patch lacks some tests.
It seems PEP 8 compliance could be better: function names shouldn't be CamelCased.
Is LocalSynchronize() an implementation detail rather than a public API? If so, I think it would be better if it started with an underscore.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-05-11 11:12:04	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola
2010-05-11 11:12:04	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-05-11 11:12:02	pitrou	link	issue8684 messages
2010-05-11 11:12:01	pitrou	create