➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, loewis, pitrou
Date 2010-06-20.20:51:48
SpamBayes Score 0.14672062
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
> It might be nice to see the version that avoids the dup() and has the 
> duplicate code instead (interesting trade-off ;).  Just for the sake of 
> comparison against the forget() proposal.

Here it is. There's probably a bit of polishing left to do, in the (unlikely) case this is chosen as a solution.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-06-20 20:51:54pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, exarkun, janssen, giampaolo.rodola
2010-06-20 20:51:54pitrousetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2010-06-20 20:51:52pitroulinkissue8524 messages
2010-06-20 20:51:52pitroucreate