Message 109619 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	richard
Recipients	BreamoreBoy, doughellmann, giampaolo.rodola, richard
Date	2010-07-08.22:12:57
SpamBayes Score	0.03441959
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Giampaolo, I think I can see where you're coming from: assuming that someone else must have also had to resort to the name-mangling hack to extend the class? In that case yes, my patch would break their code. I'll look at re-working it to use properties while retaining the underlying attributes. Would that be acceptable? What additional tests would you deem necessary?

Giampaolo,

I think I can see where you're coming from: assuming that someone else must have also had to resort to the name-mangling hack to extend the class? In that case yes, my patch would break their code. I'll look at re-working it to use properties while retaining the underlying attributes. Would that be acceptable?

What additional tests would you deem necessary?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-08 22:13:04	richard	set	recipients: + richard, giampaolo.rodola, doughellmann, BreamoreBoy
2010-07-08 22:13:03	richard	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-07-08 22:12:57	richard	link	issue4184 messages
2010-07-08 22:12:57	richard	create