Message 110253 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rnk
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, pitrou, rnk
Date	2010-07-14.04:56:40
SpamBayes Score	0.0005836085
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I have an patch for unladen-swallow out for review here: http://codereview.appspot.com/160063/show It resolves the correctness issues I mentioned previously by emitting guards if necessary. If the type is predictable and uses slots, then we don't need to check the instance dict. It gives a 5% speedup on the unpickle benchmark. Presumably the other benchmarks do not do as many method calls.

I have an patch for unladen-swallow out for review here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/160063/show

It resolves the correctness issues I mentioned previously by emitting guards if necessary.  If the type is predictable and uses slots, then we don't need to check the instance dict.

It gives a 5% speedup on the unpickle benchmark.  Presumably the other benchmarks do not do as many method calls.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-14 04:56:59	rnk	set	recipients: + rnk, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2010-07-14 04:56:58	rnk	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-07-14 04:56:43	rnk	link	issue6033 messages
2010-07-14 04:56:40	rnk	create