Message 110960 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, djc, eric.araujo
Date	2010-07-20.20:09:53
SpamBayes Score	0.0022126716
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> why the pending status? To me this is a way to say "I will close this next time I look unless someone will change my mind." "pending" has a nice property that it will change to "open" once someone adds a comment. This is exactly what I wanted in this case. > do you think this is a doc bug? Interestingly, I could not find any discussion of += for lists in the docs. This maybe because "+=" is not really search friendly. In any case, a doc bug (if any) should be reported under a separate issue.

> why the pending status?

To me this is a way to say "I will close this next time I look unless someone will change my mind."  "pending" has a nice property that it will change to "open" once someone adds a comment.  This is exactly what I wanted in this case.

> do you think this is a doc bug?

Interestingly, I could not find any discussion of += for lists in the docs.  This maybe because "+=" is not really search friendly.  In any case, a doc bug (if any) should be reported under a separate issue.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-20 20:10:03	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, amaury.forgeotdarc, djc, eric.araujo
2010-07-20 20:10:03	belopolsky	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-07-20 20:09:53	belopolsky	link	issue9314 messages
2010-07-20 20:09:53	belopolsky	create