Message 111508 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	Christophe Simonis, belopolsky, jackdied, pitrou, rhettinger, vdupras
Date	2010-07-24.22:12:47
SpamBayes Score	0.024273964
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> FWIW, I agree with Antoine. You cannot know in advance whether a > partial-subclass has semantics that need to be preserved when > flattening. Raymond, I have actually conceded this point to Antoine. See msg108980 above. Not only the latest patch preserves partial-subclasses, it also foregoes the optimization if there is anything in __dict__ of the inner partial. It looks like we have a consensus on the features, the remaining question is whether this is enough of an optimization to justify adding extra code.

> FWIW, I agree with Antoine. You cannot know in advance whether a
> partial-subclass has semantics that need to be preserved when
> flattening.


Raymond,

I have actually conceded this point to Antoine.  See msg108980 above.  Not only the latest patch preserves partial-subclasses, it also foregoes the optimization if there is anything in __dict__ of the inner partial.

It looks like we have a consensus on the features, the remaining question is whether this is enough of an optimization to justify adding extra code.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-24 22:12:49	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, rhettinger, pitrou, jackdied, vdupras, Christophe Simonis
2010-07-24 22:12:49	belopolsky	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-07-24 22:12:48	belopolsky	link	issue7830 messages
2010-07-24 22:12:47	belopolsky	create