Message112416
Although you say this is fairly common, I haven't heard of anyone using or requesting this type of feature. Do you have any real-world use cases for this? Before we start adding more read methods I think we should know who wants them and why.
I'm not sure duplicates should raise exceptions. To me, the current behavior of using the last read section/option is fine. It's predictable and it works. Halting a program's operation due to duplicate sections/options seems a bit harsh to me. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010-08-02 02:38:44 | brian.curtin | set | recipients:
+ brian.curtin, ezio.melotti, lukasz.langa |
| 2010-08-02 02:38:44 | brian.curtin | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2010-08-02 02:38:42 | brian.curtin | link | issue9452 messages |
| 2010-08-02 02:38:41 | brian.curtin | create | |
|