Message119760
Right. The condition object change is necessary to have timeout work. I can remove that feature, and slate it for another day. Add a separate patch for a Condition.wait() return value. All of the other apis are able to let the caller know whether a timeout occurred or not, I think Condition.wait() should do the same.
Actually, I can fudge the timeout with time.clock(), which is good enough.
I'll write up some docs. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010-10-28 06:54:51 | kristjan.jonsson | set | recipients:
+ kristjan.jonsson, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, jyasskin |
| 2010-10-28 06:54:51 | kristjan.jonsson | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2010-10-28 06:54:49 | kristjan.jonsson | link | issue8777 messages |
| 2010-10-28 06:54:48 | kristjan.jonsson | create | |
|