Message 122249 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	stutzbach
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, eric.smith, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, terry.reedy, tim.peters
Date	2010-11-23.22:29:48
SpamBayes Score	0.004149613
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Antoine, My original patch was much more focused, but had a slightly larger performance penalty for sorting random keys (see http://bugs.python.org/msg122178). Do you think the performance tradeoff there was still worthwhile? Ihave uploaded my original patch (as one patch :) ) here: http://codereview.appspot.com/3291041 If you think the original performance looks like a worthwhile tradeoff, could you spend about 1 minute looking over that version of patch and give your general impression?

Antoine,

My original patch was much more focused, but had a slightly larger performance penalty for sorting random keys (see http://bugs.python.org/msg122178).  Do you think the performance tradeoff there was still worthwhile?

Ihave uploaded my original patch (as one patch :) ) here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/3291041

If you think the original performance looks like a worthwhile tradeoff, could you spend about 1 minute looking over that version of patch and give your general impression?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-11-23 22:29:50	stutzbach	set	recipients: + stutzbach, tim.peters, collinwinter, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, eric.smith
2010-11-23 22:29:50	stutzbach	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-11-23 22:29:48	stutzbach	link	issue9915 messages
2010-11-23 22:29:48	stutzbach	create