Message 124111 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	m.sucajtys, orsenthil, pitrou, rosslagerwall, vstinner
Date	2010-12-16.07:59:30
SpamBayes Score	0.023724794
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I just read the whole discussion and it seems that code was in place so that client can tolerant of a BAD HTTP 0.9 Server response. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/OldServers.html Given that issue10711 talks about removing HTTP/0.9 support (+1 to that), this issue will become obsolete. I too support removing HTTP/0.9. There are hardly any advantages in keeping it around.

I just read the whole discussion and it seems that code was in place so that client can tolerant of a BAD HTTP 0.9 Server response.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/OldServers.html

Given that issue10711 talks about removing HTTP/0.9 support (+1 to that), this issue will become obsolete.  I too support removing HTTP/0.9. There are hardly any advantages in keeping it around.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-12-16 07:59:33	orsenthil	set	recipients: + orsenthil, pitrou, vstinner, m.sucajtys, rosslagerwall
2010-12-16 07:59:33	orsenthil	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-12-16 07:59:30	orsenthil	link	issue6791 messages
2010-12-16 07:59:30	orsenthil	create