Message 138206 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Darren.Dale, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, dsdale24, eric.araujo, eric.snow, michael.foord, ncoghlan, stutzbach
Date	2011-06-12.12:02:41
SpamBayes Score	0.015709586
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
In that paragraph, I was only talking about cases where "foo = 1" isn't a valid override (which, I hope you'll agree, it typically won't be). Your described approach of declaring an abstract property and then overriding it with an ordinary class attribute is part of the answer I gave Eric in pointing out why a separate concept of an abstract attribute isn't really necessary.

In that paragraph, I was only talking about cases where "foo = 1" *isn't* a valid override (which, I hope you'll agree, it typically won't be).

Your described approach of declaring an abstract property and then overriding it with an ordinary class attribute is part of the answer I gave Eric in pointing out why a separate concept of an abstract attribute isn't really necessary.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-06-12 12:02:42	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach, eric.araujo, michael.foord, daniel.urban, dsdale24, eric.snow, Darren.Dale
2011-06-12 12:02:42	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2011-06-12 12:02:41	ncoghlan	link	issue11610 messages
2011-06-12 12:02:41	ncoghlan	create