➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skrah
Recipients [email protected], loewis, mark.dickinson, skrah, vstinner
Date 2011-09-15.19:57:28
SpamBayes Score 1.4751673e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to <[email protected]>
Content 
Mark Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, they're all in the standard, which is publicly available. 

I have the real thing. :)

> The correctness of the patch depends on:
> (2) an assumption that the C implementation will never raise an
>     'implementation-defined' signal (C99 6.3.1.3p3).  This seems
>     reasonable:  I'm fairly sure that this provision is there mainly
>     for systems using ones' complement or sign-magnitude
>     representations for signed integers, and it's safe to assume
>     that Python won't meet such systems.

This is what I was concerned about, but the assumption seems safe.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-15 19:57:28skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, loewis, mark.dickinson, vstinner, [email protected]
2011-09-15 19:57:28skrahlinkissue12973 messages
2011-09-15 19:57:28skrahcreate