Message 156789 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner
Date	2012-03-25.23:54:24
SpamBayes Score	2.7479746e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> It's clutter and we should show some restraint before adding new types. dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type. We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. Or it may be exposed in a module like collections.

> It's clutter and we should show some restraint before adding new types.

dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type. We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. Or it may be exposed in a module like collections.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-03-25 23:54:25	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, rhettinger, r.david.murray, eric.snow, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-25 23:54:25	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-03-25 23:54:24	vstinner	link	issue14386 messages
2012-03-25 23:54:24	vstinner	create