Message157422
I can't find where we talked about this, maybe just IRC, but that's there (perhaps poorly) as a special case.
0 is 0, but signal.CTRL_C_EVENT is also 0. We try the signal version first then fall back to TerminateProcess.
I was just looking at this myself and it's not great. I actually wish we could change what signal.CTRL_C_EVENT means, or maybe add a flag to determine if the second parameter is supposed to be a return code or a signal? I'm open to anything. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012-04-03 14:20:00 | brian.curtin | set | recipients:
+ brian.curtin, pitrou, tim.golden, asvetlov |
| 2012-04-03 14:20:00 | brian.curtin | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2012-04-03 14:19:59 | brian.curtin | link | issue14484 messages |
| 2012-04-03 14:19:59 | brian.curtin | create | |
|