Message 160047 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	larry
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, eric.smith, georg.brandl, larry, loewis, mark.dickinson, python-dev, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2012-05-06.00:21:17
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> I would have expected a bool parse code to insist on a boolean, I originally had a second form ('P') that insisted on a boolean as you suggest. But nobody could come up with a use case. So I removed it in the final patch. Please see this issue for the discussion. If you have a use case for it I'd be happy to revive it and check it in.

> I would have expected a bool parse code to insist on a boolean,

I originally had a second form ('P') that insisted on a boolean as you suggest.  But nobody could come up with a use case.  So I removed it in the final patch.  Please see this issue for the discussion.

If you have a use case for it I'd be happy to revive it and check it in.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-05-06 00:21:18	larry	set	recipients: + larry, loewis, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2012-05-06 00:21:18	larry	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-05-06 00:21:18	larry	link	issue14705 messages
2012-05-06 00:21:17	larry	create