Message160727
> If asyncore and asynchat are (mostly?) supporting an alternate
> socket map, why is it necessary to copy create_socket?
> Shouldn't we be fixing create_socket in asyncore instead?
Well, I don't see how this can be done along with keeping existing behaviour, since if you currently pass a map to the dispatcher constructor, it's not passed to set_socket; fixing it in asyncore would mean changing this fact, and so in theory could break existing code. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012-05-15 13:39:21 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, maker |
| 2012-05-15 13:39:21 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2012-05-15 13:39:20 | vinay.sajip | link | issue11959 messages |
| 2012-05-15 13:39:20 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|