Message 161277 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	zulla
Recipients	ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, orsenthil, r.david.murray, zulla
Date	2012-05-21.15:09:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
we should at least check if the .port attribute is an intereger >= 1 and <= 65535. _because_ this is the only valid port range. otherwise, it is no valid port. but it may be a integer overflow attack attempt when a developer uses .port, he is counting on the result being valid

we should at least check if the .port attribute is an intereger >= 1 and <= 65535. _because_ this is the only valid port range. otherwise, it is no valid port. but it may be a integer overflow attack attempt

when a developer uses .port, he is counting on the result being valid

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-05-21 15:09:22	zulla	set	recipients: + zulla, ncoghlan, orsenthil, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray
2012-05-21 15:09:22	zulla	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-05-21 15:09:21	zulla	link	issue14036 messages
2012-05-21 15:09:21	zulla	create