Message 163464 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	serhiy.storchaka
Recipients	Arfrever, Yury.Selivanov, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, larry, neologix, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2012-06-22.19:22:52
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210 > Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a > :exc:`NotImplementedError`. > Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks > is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't > support symlinks at all? And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it be NotImplementedError?

> > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210
> Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a
> :exc:`NotImplementedError`.
> Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks
> is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't
> support symlinks at all?

And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support
at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it
be NotImplementedError?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-22 19:22:53	serhiy.storchaka	set	recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, gvanrossum, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, Yury.Selivanov, rosslagerwall
2012-06-22 19:22:53	serhiy.storchaka	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-06-22 19:22:52	serhiy.storchaka	link	issue14626 messages
2012-06-22 19:22:52	serhiy.storchaka	create