Message 172469 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	christian.heimes, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2012-10-09.10:17:09
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> If you prefer two macros instead of three then we should name them > PY_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN and PY_IS_BIG_ENDIAN. Fine with me. Having three macros is pointless complication. > If I understand you correctly than we can't have a configure definition > and need macro magic like brg_endian.h. Replicating the current WORDS_BIGENDIAN logic should be enough.

> If you prefer two macros instead of three then we should name them
> PY_IS_LITTLE_ENDIAN and PY_IS_BIG_ENDIAN.

Fine with me. Having three macros is pointless complication.

> If I understand you correctly than we can't have a configure definition 
> and need macro magic like brg_endian.h.

Replicating the current WORDS_BIGENDIAN logic should be enough.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-10-09 10:17:10	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, christian.heimes, ned.deily, serhiy.storchaka
2012-10-09 10:17:10	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-10-09 10:17:10	pitrou	link	issue16166 messages
2012-10-09 10:17:09	pitrou	create