Message 175927 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	trent
Recipients	trent
Date	2012-11-18.22:32:52
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Attached patch adds select.poll() support on Windows via WSAPoll. It's hacky; I was curious to see whether or not it could be done, and whether or not tulip's pollster would work with it. It compiles and works, but doesn't play very nicely with tulip. Also, just about every lick of code that tests poll() does so in a UNIX-specific way, so it's hard to test. As with select, WSAPoll() will barf if you feed it anything other than SOCKETs (i.e. it doesn't work against non-socket file descriptors).

Attached patch adds select.poll() support on Windows via WSAPoll.

It's hacky; I was curious to see whether or not it could be done, and whether or not tulip's pollster would work with it.

It compiles and works, but doesn't play very nicely with tulip.  Also, just about every lick of code that tests poll() does so in a UNIX-specific way, so it's hard to test.

As with select, WSAPoll() will barf if you feed it anything other than SOCKETs (i.e. it doesn't work against non-socket file descriptors).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-18 22:32:54	trent	set	recipients: + trent
2012-11-18 22:32:54	trent	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-11-18 22:32:54	trent	link	issue16507 messages
2012-11-18 22:32:53	trent	create