Message183468
That's a use case that I'm not very *interested* in supporting personally - however it may well be a use case that was "designed in" and that others have a need for (I didn't implement expectedFailure support).
I think expectedFailure should be used sparingly and for a utility function to be *able* to turn a failure into a expectedFailure sounds actively dangerous. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013-03-04 16:12:59 | michael.foord | set | recipients:
+ michael.foord, terry.reedy, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, hpk, flox, fperez, chris.jerdonek, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
| 2013-03-04 16:12:59 | michael.foord | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2013-03-04 16:12:59 | michael.foord | link | issue16997 messages |
| 2013-03-04 16:12:59 | michael.foord | create | |
|