Message183781
Code behaving as documented is not a bug for tracker purposes. Adding a parameter to allow new behavior is an enhancement for a future release.
Who is responsible for the invalid cookie. Pardon my ignorance, but if tornado re-sets the cookie, why cannot it read it the next time?
If the existing test suite tests for CookieError for invalid cookies, writing tests for strict=False (return instead of CookieError) would be trivial. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013-03-09 01:23:16 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, georg.brandl, spookylukey, keakon |
| 2013-03-09 01:23:16 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2013-03-09 01:23:16 | terry.reedy | link | issue17340 messages |
| 2013-03-09 01:23:15 | terry.reedy | create | |
|