This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients alexnvdias, r.david.murray
Date 2013-08-21.10:25:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content
It would be clearer, I think, to call it average time.  I must admit to not being sure why that is useful.  I'm also worried there might be backward compatibility issues with changing the ordering of the data structure.  If new fields are going to be added they should probably be added at the end.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-21 10:25:17r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, alexnvdias
2013-08-21 10:25:17r.david.murraysetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2013-08-21 10:25:17r.david.murraylinkissue18795 messages
2013-08-21 10:25:17r.david.murraycreate