Message 203019 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Arfrever, christian.heimes, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2013-11-16.10:24:39
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Thanks - are those numbers with the current feature branch, and hence no small string optimization? To be completely clear, I'm happy to accept a performance penalty to fix the hash algorithm. I'd just like to know exactly how big a penalty I'm accepting, and whether taking advantage of the small string optimization makes it measurably smaller.

Thanks - are those numbers with the current feature branch, and hence no small string optimization?

To be completely clear, I'm happy to accept a performance penalty to fix the hash algorithm. I'd just like to know exactly how big a penalty I'm accepting, and whether taking advantage of the small string optimization makes it measurably smaller.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-11-16 10:24:39	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, neologix, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2013-11-16 10:24:39	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2013-11-16 10:24:39	ncoghlan	link	issue19183 messages
2013-11-16 10:24:39	ncoghlan	create