Message 203189 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	christian.heimes, dsoprea, dstufft, jcea, maker, pitrou, underrun
Date	2013-11-17.15:00:04
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
@Dustin > My two-cents is to leave it a tuple (why not?). Because tuples are more used for struct-like data. Here we are returning an unknown number of homogenous objects, which generally calls for a list. @Christian > I'd rather return a list or tuple of X509 objects but #18369 won't be ready for 3.4. Ideas? Unless the feature is really important to have right now, I think it's ok to defer it until we have X509 objects.

@Dustin

> My two-cents is to leave it a tuple (why not?).

Because tuples are more used for struct-like data. Here we are returning an unknown number of homogenous objects, which generally calls for a list.

@Christian

> I'd rather return a list or tuple of X509 objects but #18369 won't be ready for 3.4. Ideas?

Unless the feature is really important to have right now, I think it's ok to defer it until we have X509 objects.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-11-17 15:00:04	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, jcea, christian.heimes, maker, underrun, dstufft, dsoprea
2013-11-17 15:00:04	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2013-11-17 15:00:04	pitrou	link	issue18233 messages
2013-11-17 15:00:04	pitrou	create