Message 211718 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	Arfrever, barry, ezio.melotti, larry, michael.foord, pitrou, rbcollins, thomir
Date	2014-02-20.10:54:55
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> Antoine: would it be reasonable to rework the implementation of > subTest in a way that permitted us to revert the changes to > expectedFailure? I can't tell you for sure, but certainly not in an easy way. Expected failures were the most delicate feature to keep compatible when adding subtests. (in other words: not for 3.4, IMO)

> Antoine: would it be reasonable to rework the implementation of
> subTest in a way that permitted us to revert the changes to
> expectedFailure?

I can't tell you for sure, but certainly not in an easy way. Expected failures were the most delicate feature to keep compatible when adding subtests.
(in other words: not for 3.4, IMO)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-02-20 10:54:55	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, barry, larry, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, michael.foord, thomir
2014-02-20 10:54:55	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2014-02-20 10:54:55	pitrou	link	issue20687 messages
2014-02-20 10:54:55	pitrou	create