Message 217391 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	ezio.melotti, nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skip.montanaro, tiwilliam
Date	2014-04-28.18:22:01
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> So I'd suggest, instead of using an hardcoded value, to simply reuse io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE. > That way, if some day we decide to change it, all user code wil benefit from the change. I don't think io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE makes much sense as a heuristic for the gzip module (or compressed files in general). Perhaps gzip should get its own DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE?

> So I'd suggest, instead of using an hardcoded value, to simply reuse io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE.
> That way, if some day we decide to change it, all user code wil benefit from the change.

I don't think io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE makes much sense as a heuristic for the gzip module (or compressed files in general). Perhaps gzip should get its own DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-04-28 18:22:01	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, neologix, serhiy.storchaka, tiwilliam
2014-04-28 18:22:01	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2014-04-28 18:22:01	pitrou	link	issue20962 messages
2014-04-28 18:22:01	pitrou	create