Message224480
I've explored a few options for the Python-level API in the attachment "bio_python_options.py".
Me personally I prefer the more light weight option #3. This is both out of selfish interest (less work for me), but also I believe that memory BIOs are an API that will be used almost exclusively by framework authors, not by end users like SSLSocket itself. So a more lower-level (but perfectly valid IMHO) API would be appropriate. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | set | recipients:
+ geertj, janssen, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, dstufft |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | link | issue21965 messages |
| 2014-08-01 09:39:39 | geertj | create | |
|