Message 227173 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mpaolini
Recipients	Guido.van.Rossum, Richard.Kiss, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, mpaolini, pitrou, python-dev, richard.kiss, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2014-09-20.20:31:46
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Sorry for keeping this alive. Take a look at the `wait_for.py` just submitted in the unrelated #22448: no strong refs to the tasks are kept. Tasks remain alive only because they are timers and the event loop keeps strong ref. Do you think my proposed patch is OK? Sould I open a new issue?

Sorry for keeping this alive.

Take a look at the `wait_for.py` just submitted in the unrelated #22448: no strong refs to the tasks are kept. Tasks remain alive only because they are timers and the event loop keeps strong ref.

Do you think my proposed patch is OK? Sould I open a new issue?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-09-20 20:31:46	mpaolini	set	recipients: + mpaolini, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, python-dev, yselivanov, Guido.van.Rossum, richard.kiss, Richard.Kiss
2014-09-20 20:31:46	mpaolini	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2014-09-20 20:31:46	mpaolini	link	issue21163 messages
2014-09-20 20:31:46	mpaolini	create