Message 235654 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	barry, cvrebert, ethan.furman, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, r.david.murray, takluyver
Date	2015-02-10.01:50:36
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Have you seen the code review comments on the Rietveld, <https://bugs.python.org/review/23342>? (Maybe check spam emails.) Many of the comments from the earlier patches still stand. In particular, I would like to see the “input” default value addressed, at least for the new run() function, if not the old check_output() function.

Have you seen the code review comments on the Rietveld, <https://bugs.python.org/review/23342>? (Maybe check spam emails.) Many of the comments from the earlier patches still stand. In particular, I would like to see the “input” default value addressed, at least for the new run() function, if not the old check_output() function.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-02-10 01:50:37	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, barry, gregory.p.smith, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ethan.furman, takluyver
2015-02-10 01:50:37	martin.panter	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2015-02-10 01:50:37	martin.panter	link	issue23342 messages
2015-02-10 01:50:36	martin.panter	create