Message 236263 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2015-02-20.10:33:31
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> The (unsigned long) declaration should probably be replaced with (uint32_t) Would it be possible to benchmark this change, to ensure that it doesn't kill performances? A quick micro-benchmark using timeit should be enough ;) I agree with the change, I already noticed the unused bits long time ago, when I took at look at the Mersenne Twister implementation.

> The (unsigned long) declaration should probably be replaced with (uint32_t)

Would it be possible to benchmark this change, to ensure that it doesn't kill performances?

A quick micro-benchmark using timeit should be enough ;)

I agree with the change, I already noticed the unused bits long time ago, when I took at look at the Mersenne Twister implementation.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-02-20 10:33:31	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
2015-02-20 10:33:31	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2015-02-20 10:33:31	vstinner	link	issue23488 messages
2015-02-20 10:33:31	vstinner	create