Message 266168 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	paul.moore
Recipients	hakril, markgrandi, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date	2016-05-23.17:31:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
My instinct is that this should only go into 3.6. It's a remote possibility, but someone could otherwise write code that uses REG_DWORD64 and say that it "works on 3.5" because they tested on 3.5.x, only to have it fail on 3.5.1. But if someone with a better feel for the implications wants to say it's OK, I wouldn't object.

My instinct is that this should only go into 3.6. It's a remote possibility, but someone could otherwise write code that uses REG_DWORD64 and say that it "works on 3.5" because they tested on 3.5.x, only to have it fail on 3.5.1.

But if someone with a better feel for the implications wants to say it's OK, I wouldn't object.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-05-23 17:31:21	paul.moore	set	recipients: + paul.moore, tim.golden, zach.ware, markgrandi, steve.dower, hakril
2016-05-23 17:31:21	paul.moore	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2016-05-23 17:31:21	paul.moore	link	issue23026 messages
2016-05-23 17:31:21	paul.moore	create