➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients Lukasa, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, icordasc, jhylton, loewis, martin.panter, orsenthil, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach
Date 2016-08-11.07:33:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
There is so very little code in support of HTTP/0.9 that I don't think we get any benefit from removing it.  So why bother with the churn?  It is cleaner to just leave it place.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-08-11 07:33:01rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, loewis, jhylton, orsenthil, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, stutzbach, eric.araujo, martin.panter, icordasc, Lukasa
2016-08-11 07:33:01rhettingersetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2016-08-11 07:33:01rhettingerlinkissue10721 messages
2016-08-11 07:33:01rhettingercreate