Message 277484 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	xiang.zhang
Recipients	belopolsky, jiangping.li, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang
Date	2016-09-27.04:07:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Patch LGTM. > I would rather not mess up with itermonthdates(), particularly in a bugfix release. We can postpone the discussion of a better way to handle date over/underflow in itermonthdates() until 3.7. Before finally find a better way, can we at least make the two extreme cases behaviours consistent? Both emitting an exception or a shorter list.

Patch LGTM. 

> I would rather not mess up with itermonthdates(), particularly in a bugfix release.  We can postpone the discussion of a better way to handle date over/underflow in itermonthdates() until 3.7.

Before finally find a better way, can we at least make the two extreme cases behaviours consistent? Both emitting an exception or a shorter list.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-09-27 04:07:16	xiang.zhang	set	recipients: + xiang.zhang, rhettinger, belopolsky, serhiy.storchaka, jiangping.li
2016-09-27 04:07:16	xiang.zhang	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2016-09-27 04:07:16	xiang.zhang	link	issue28253 messages
2016-09-27 04:07:15	xiang.zhang	create