Message 285893 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	palaviv
Recipients	Big Stone, berker.peksag, callidomus, fschulze, ghaering, jaraco, malin, ned.deily, palaviv, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, xiang.zhang
Date	2017-01-20.09:10:52
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Uploading a new patch with fixes from Ma Lin comments. Two points: 1. Should we add the VACUUM with a explicit commit? Maybe there should be an implicit commit before VACUUM? 2. Should a SELECT start a transaction? I think it should according to PEP 249. There is a open issue on the case (#9924). Should we just change this on this patch?

Uploading a new patch with fixes from Ma Lin comments.
Two points:
1. Should we add the VACUUM with a explicit commit? Maybe there should be an implicit commit before VACUUM?
2. Should a SELECT start a transaction? I think it should according to PEP 249. There is a open issue on the case (#9924). Should we just change this on this patch?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-01-20 09:10:53	palaviv	set	recipients: + palaviv, ghaering, jaraco, ned.deily, r.david.murray, socketpair, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, malin, xiang.zhang, Big Stone, fschulze, callidomus
2017-01-20 09:10:53	palaviv	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-01-20 09:10:53	palaviv	link	issue28518 messages
2017-01-20 09:10:53	palaviv	create