Message305463
By the way, the submitted PR follows Dan's argument about the initializer's argument: the actual call is `initializer(*initargs)`. If someone wants to know about the current thread or process, it's trivial to call `thread.current_thread()` or `multiprocessing.current_process()` (and I don't it's a bad idiom in itself :-)).
If you want to comment on the PR, I would recommend doing it quick, as I plan to merge in a day or two :-) |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017-11-03 09:02:51 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, bquinlan, mark.dickinson, giampaolo.rodola, Claudiu.Popa, jcon, mdengler, s0undt3ch, thehesiod, josh.r, andreasvc, dan.oreilly, nchammas, Shiming He |
| 2017-11-03 09:02:51 | pitrou | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2017-11-03 09:02:51 | pitrou | link | issue21423 messages |
| 2017-11-03 09:02:51 | pitrou | create | |
|