Message 306836 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	yselivanov
Recipients	Inyeol.Lee, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, arigo, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, danielsh, emptysquare, erickt, esc24, georg.brandl, glyph, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, ncoghlan, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date	2017-11-23.16:38:06
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> ... but [await x for x in xs] is still valid _only_ inside async def. Yes, because it's computed right where it is defined. a = [x for x in xs] # `a` is a list object a = (x for x in xs) # `a` is a generator Do you understand the difference?

> ... but [await x for x in xs] is still valid _only_ inside async def.

Yes, because it's computed right where it is defined.

a = [x for x in xs]  # `a` is a list object
a = (x for x in xs)  # `a` is a generator

Do you understand the difference?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-11-23 16:38:06	yselivanov	set	recipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, arigo, georg.brandl, rhettinger, ncoghlan, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, erickt, glyph, Inyeol.Lee, serhiy.storchaka, esc24, danielsh, emptysquare, levkivskyi, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard
2017-11-23 16:38:06	yselivanov	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-11-23 16:38:06	yselivanov	link	issue10544 messages
2017-11-23 16:38:06	yselivanov	create