Message 309308 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nh2
Recipients	nh2, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2017-12-31.21:14:38
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> Did you try to sync and flush caches before running `rm -r`? Yes, it doesn't make a difference for me, I still see the same O(n²) behaviour in `rm -r`. I've sent an email "O(n^2) performance of rm -r" to [email protected] just now, unfortunately I can't link it yet because the mailman archive doesn't show it yet. It should appear soon on http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2017-12/threads.html.

> Did you try to sync and flush caches before running `rm -r`?

Yes, it doesn't make a difference for me, I still see the same O(n²) behaviour in `rm -r`.

I've sent an email "O(n^2) performance of rm -r" to [email protected] just now, unfortunately I can't link it yet because the mailman archive doesn't show it yet. It should appear soon on http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2017-12/threads.html.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-12-31 21:14:38	nh2	set	recipients: + nh2, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
2017-12-31 21:14:38	nh2	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-12-31 21:14:38	nh2	link	issue32453 messages
2017-12-31 21:14:38	nh2	create