Message 318091 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	eric.snow, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2018-05-29.20:55:34
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I agree with Victor, we shouldn't add PyObject fields that only have use in certain (minority) situations. The idea of tracking per arena will be non-trivial to implement, as only small objects (smaller than 512 bytes) use our own allocator; larger objects go to the system allocator. Can I ask why you're considering this? I thought you didn't want to transfer ownership between interpreters.

I agree with Victor, we shouldn't add PyObject fields that only have use in certain (minority) situations.

The idea of tracking per arena will be non-trivial to implement, as only small objects (smaller than 512 bytes) use our own allocator; larger objects go to the system allocator.

Can I ask why you're considering this?  I thought you didn't want to transfer ownership between interpreters.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-05-29 20:55:34	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, vstinner, eric.snow
2018-05-29 20:55:34	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-05-29 20:55:34	pitrou	link	issue33607 messages
2018-05-29 20:55:34	pitrou	create