Message 336790 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	yselivanov
Recipients	emma_smith, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, masthana, msullivan, yselivanov
Date	2019-02-28.01:25:45
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> But why would we? I already have a working solution. I've heard some complaints that it's hard to migrate to Python 3.7 because async and await are keywords (although I think by now all popular libraries have migrated already), so in case you ever considered to revert that decision I think we could actually make it work. But for the current PR you're working on we don't need that, you're right.

> But why would we? I already have a working solution. 

I've heard some complaints that it's hard to migrate to Python 3.7 because async and await are keywords (although I think by now all popular libraries have migrated already), so in case you ever considered to revert that decision I think we could actually make it work.  But for the current PR you're working on we don't need that, you're right.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-02-28 01:25:45	yselivanov	set	recipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, emma_smith, masthana, msullivan
2019-02-28 01:25:45	yselivanov	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-02-28 01:25:45	yselivanov	link	issue35975 messages
2019-02-28 01:25:45	yselivanov	create