Message 356024 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, njs, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2019-11-05.11:08:16
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I like the idea of exposing pidfd_open() syscall as os.pidfd_open(). Benjamin: Would you mind to create a PR based on your patch, but without your asyncio change? > +#ifndef __NR_pidfd_open I would prefer to avoid this part of the patch. You should accept an optional flags parameter, no?

I like the idea of exposing pidfd_open() syscall as os.pidfd_open().

Benjamin: Would you mind to create a PR based on your patch, but without your asyncio change?

> +#ifndef __NR_pidfd_open

I would prefer to avoid this part of the patch.

You should accept an optional flags parameter, no?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-11-05 11:08:16	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov
2019-11-05 11:08:16	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-11-05 11:08:16	vstinner	link	issue38692 messages
2019-11-05 11:08:16	vstinner	create