Message369047
This is now merged, thanks for the debate and opinions offered everyone, and thanks to Dong-hee for the implementation!
The way we did the implementation, a pickle/unpickle cycle on the result of .isocalendar() will return a plain tuple. Despite the fact that I suggested it, I recognize that this is a /weird thing to do/, and I'm sorta banking on the fact that in all likelihood no one is relying on pickling and unpickling the result of .isocalendar() returning anything but a tuple (since, currently, that's already what it does, regardless of what the input type was).
I suppose we'll have to see if it causes problems in the beta period, and I'll keep a close eye on it. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2020-05-16 14:17:08 | p-ganssle | set | recipients:
+ p-ganssle, tim.peters, rhettinger, belopolsky, taleinat, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, bmispelon, corona10 |
| 2020-05-16 14:17:08 | p-ganssle | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2020-05-16 14:17:08 | p-ganssle | link | issue24416 messages |
| 2020-05-16 14:17:08 | p-ganssle | create | |
|