Message 376301 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pablogsal
Recipients	blarsen, gvanrossum, pablogsal
Date	2020-09-03.14:08:44
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> return _Py_Call(_PyPegen_dummy_name(p), args, keywords, EXTRA_EXPR(first, last->element)); Actually, this is not enough because last->element may be a keyword_ty. I have updated PR 22077 to receive the EXTRA macro in the call because that simplifies the code and allows us to not need to distinguish between keywords and expr_ty elements.

> return _Py_Call(_PyPegen_dummy_name(p), args, keywords, EXTRA_EXPR(first, last->element));

Actually, this is not enough because last->element may be a keyword_ty.

I have updated PR 22077 to receive the EXTRA macro in the call because that simplifies the code and allows us to not need to distinguish between keywords and expr_ty elements.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-09-03 14:08:44	pablogsal	set	recipients: + pablogsal, gvanrossum, blarsen
2020-09-03 14:08:44	pablogsal	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2020-09-03 14:08:44	pablogsal	link	issue41697 messages
2020-09-03 14:08:44	pablogsal	create