Message 413475 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	alex.gronholm
Recipients	ajoino, alex.gronholm, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, gvanrossum, iritkatriel, jab, njs, tinchester, yselivanov
Date	2022-02-18.10:57:37
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I am also uncomfortable using the cancel message to deliver the token/nonce/whatever. If TaskGroup.cancel() is implemented, would it also deliver a cancellation in the parent task like trio and AnyIO do? It should IMHO, because otherwise if the task group is cancelled, it could still get stuck waiting on whatever the parent task happens to be waiting on, if it's not at TaskGroup.__aexit__() yet.

I am also uncomfortable using the cancel message to deliver the token/nonce/whatever.

If TaskGroup.cancel() is implemented, would it also deliver a cancellation in the parent task like trio and AnyIO do? It should IMHO, because otherwise if the task group is cancelled, it could still get stuck waiting on whatever the parent task happens to be waiting on, if it's not at TaskGroup.__aexit__() yet.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2022-02-18 10:57:37	alex.gronholm	set	recipients: + alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, njs, jab, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, yselivanov, tinchester, iritkatriel, ajoino
2022-02-18 10:57:37	alex.gronholm	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2022-02-18 10:57:37	alex.gronholm	link	issue46771 messages
2022-02-18 10:57:37	alex.gronholm	create