Message 416901 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	socketpair
Recipients	Yonatan Goldschmidt, gregory.p.smith, izbyshev, koobs, pablogsal, ronaldoussoren, socketpair
Date	2022-04-06.21:16:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
See #47245. https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/spawni.c#L309 In short - do not use vfork(). Use clone(CLONE_VM \| CLONE_VFORK). And build separate stack. Current implementation is heavily broken. Another guy has failed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215813. Please comment calling vfork() as soon as possible in order to fallback to fork() implementation. Until you (or me?) write good vfork children code.

See #47245.

https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/spawni.c#L309

In short - do not use vfork(). Use clone(CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK). And build separate stack.

Current implementation is heavily broken.

Another guy has failed: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215813.


Please comment calling vfork() as soon as possible in order to fallback to fork() implementation. Until you (or me?) write good vfork children code.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2022-04-06 21:16:41	socketpair	set	recipients: + socketpair, gregory.p.smith, ronaldoussoren, koobs, izbyshev, pablogsal, Yonatan Goldschmidt
2022-04-06 21:16:41	socketpair	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2022-04-06 21:16:41	socketpair	link	issue35823 messages
2022-04-06 21:16:41	socketpair	create