Message 59613 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	donmez, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, theller
Date	2008-01-09.17:46:04
SpamBayes Score	0.07624191
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
It would actually be better to use -fno-strict-overflow instead of -fwrapv, if it exists (GCC 4.2 and later). See also http://bugs.python.org/issue1621 which suggests there aren't actually many places that need this; gcc -Wstrict-overflow should help auditing the code.

It would actually be better to use -fno-strict-overflow instead of
-fwrapv, if it exists (GCC 4.2 and later).

See also http://bugs.python.org/issue1621 which suggests there aren't
actually many places that need this; gcc -Wstrict-overflow should help
auditing the code.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-01-09 17:46:08	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.0762419 -> 0.07624191 recipients: + gvanrossum, loewis, theller, gregory.p.smith, donmez
2008-01-09 17:46:07	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.0762419 -> 0.0762419 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-01-09 17:46:04	gvanrossum	link	issue1608 messages
2008-01-09 17:46:04	gvanrossum	create