Message 61928 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	stutsman
Recipients	loewis, stutsman
Date	2008-01-31.20:51:28
SpamBayes Score	0.06937828
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Yeah; I shuold be able to provide one. I just hacked 2.4.4 to work so I think I could provide a fix easily. The version I put together here is rough, so I'll try to create a cleaner solution tonight or this weekend. HiStar does (http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/). Not sure if it's better to test for pid_t (in configure) or just use a long long value all around a punt the problem? I'll probably just go with the former unless there are objections.

Yeah; I shuold be able to provide one.  I just hacked 2.4.4 to work so I
think I could provide a fix easily.  The version I put together here is
rough, so I'll try to create a cleaner solution tonight or this weekend.

HiStar does (http://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/).

Not sure if it's better to test for pid_t (in configure) or just use a
long long value all around a punt the problem?  I'll probably just go
with the former unless there are objections.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-01-31 20:51:32	stutsman	set	spambayes_score: 0.0693783 -> 0.06937828 recipients: + stutsman, loewis
2008-01-31 20:51:32	stutsman	set	spambayes_score: 0.0693783 -> 0.0693783 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-01-31 20:51:28	stutsman	link	issue1983 messages
2008-01-31 20:51:28	stutsman	create