This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author _doublep
Recipients _doublep, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, nnorwitz, rhettinger
Date 2008-02-26.14:38:20
SpamBayes Score 0.1461291
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content
Actually, it is even better.  Since you don't increment codelen, that
extra RETURN_VALUE is "virtual" in that it acts as a sentinel, but will
not appear in the resulting bytecode.  You can test this by backing out
the patch and disassembling something.  For this reason, if() before
writing the RETURN_VALUE is not needed.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-02-26 14:38:21_doublepsetspambayes_score: 0.146129 -> 0.1461291
recipients: + _doublep, gvanrossum, nnorwitz, rhettinger, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson
2008-02-26 14:38:21_doublepsetspambayes_score: 0.146129 -> 0.146129
messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-02-26 14:38:20_doubleplinkissue1394 messages
2008-02-26 14:38:20_doublepcreate